A big business in America and overseas...
Kahoot game:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIFkut11Xpc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2s59Kug2u4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-vyBhEK36o
A big business in America and overseas...
Question1:[2 POINTS] Indicate whether the following statements are TRUE or FALSE and write down which part of the text justifies your answer.
1. The importance of street art in Berlin is a very recent phenomenon.
FALSE “For decades, street art has been an essential part of Berlin’s cultural DNA”
2. The new museum only displays exhibits from Germany.
FALSE “of urban contemporary art from around the globe”
3. Graffiti is the only type of exhibit on display in the new museum.
FALSE “to now include digital works, hyper-realistic paintings, sculpture and more”
4. Some of the exhibits at the new museum are outside the actual building.
TRUE “The art isn’t limited to the inside of the museum”
Question 2:[2 POINTS] Answer the following questions in your own words according to the text
1. Why is Berlin known for street art?
Different reasons:
• It has been culturally important for a long time.
• Before reunification it was used to express political ideas.
• After reunification, this was also true.
• Many tourists have visited the city to see the graffiti.
• The new museum is another reason to visit the city.
Model answer:
Berlin has been famous for its graffiti for a long time, as both before and after reunification, it is a way that people used to express their political ideas. Nowadays a lot of people specifically visit the city to see the street art and the new museum is also encouraging this trend.
2. What different things make the new museum special?
Different things:
• There are a lot of exhibits from around the globe.
• The history and evolution of graffiti is also presented.
• There are different types of exhibit: painting, sculpture and digital.
• The museum took a long time to plan and organize.
• There are also exhibit outside the actual museum building.
Model answer:
The new museum is special because of the range of different origins of the exhibits – there are works from all over the world, and also because there are different formats, such as drawings, sculptures and digital exhibits. It also uses the buildings around the museum to display some of the works, so the art is both inside and outside the building.
Question 3:[1,5 POINTS]Find words or phrases in the text that correspond to the words given.
1. vital (paragraph 1) essential
2. famous (paragraph 2) well-known
3. generally ( paragraph 3) commonly
4.to keep ( paragraph 4)(to) preserve
5.what`s more ( paragraph 5 ) additionally
Question 4:[1,5 POINTS]Choose the correct option, a, b, c or d for each question and COPY the sentence onto your answer sheet.
1. The text says that…
a. many people visit the city of Berlin because of its street art.
b. many people visit the city of Berlin despite its street art.
c. many people visit the city of Berlin in order to create new street art.
d. many people will not visit the city of Berlin unless more street art is created.
2. Yasha Young …
a. worked completely on her own to choose the works for the new museum.
b. worked with a small team of museum staff to choose the works for the new museum.
c. worked with a very large group of artists to choose the works for the new museum.
d. worked with a group of more than one hundred museum staff to choose the works for the museum.
3. Various artists…
a. have asked to create artwork in the Schoenberg neighbourhood.
b. have been asked to create artwork in the Schöenberg neighbourhood.
c. have to be asked to create artwork in the Schoenberg neighbourhood.
d. have to ask to create artwork in the Schoenberg neighbourhood.
Question 5:[3 POINTS]Write a short essay (about 120-150 words) on the following topic: Do you think government should spend/invest more money to make art more attractive to younger people? Justify your opinion.
EXPRESSING PURPOSE (LINKERS OF PURPOSE)
Writing topics:
Structure of the Opinion Essay:
INTRO
AN EXAMPLE:
Is a Four-Day Working Week the Secret of Happiness?
Finland’s new prime minister has recently proposed the idea of a four-day working week. It sounds quite glorious, doesn’t it? Reducing the length of the working week has been shown to boost productivity. When, in August, Microsoft Japan tested a four-day week, productivity shot up by about 40%. One Melbourne organisation found a six-hour working day forced employees to eliminate unproductive activities such as sending pointless emails, sitting in lengthy meetings and wasting time on the internet. British businesses that have successfully switched to a four-day week include Elektra Lighting and Portcullis Legals.
A survey by one British workers’ organisation found that only 45% of employees want a four-day week. However, according to a study by Henley Business School, 77% of workers said a four-day week improved their quality of life. When the city of Gothenburg in Sweden introduced a six-hour day for some nurses, the nurses became healthier, happier and more energetic. Reducing working hours is also good for the natural environment. A shorter working week could lead to a significant cut in our carbon footprint as employees produce less carbon emissions getting to work, use fewer resources at work and have more time to cook and shop instead of buying takeaway food delivered in plastic containers.
Although a shorter working week has many benefits, it is not a magic solution. The Wellcome Trust backtracked on plans for a four-day week, saying it would be “too operationally complex”. Gothenberg dropped its six-hour-day experiment because of increased costs. In general, bosses tend to worry that a shorter working week will create staffing challenges and make it harder to serve customers, while employees worry that working less will make them look lazy.
These
challenges are not impossible to face, though. Indeed, reduced working days are
nothing new. Since the industrial revolution, the number of hours worked has
been falling. When working hours in Britain were cut from about 54 hours a week
to 48 hours a week in 1919, it had no effect on productivity and
competitiveness. Kellogg’s, the US cereal manufacturer, successfully operated a
six-hour working-day policy for many years in the middle of the 20th century.
It was only dropped because management wanted the firm to have work practices
like other companies. It is entirely possible to be happier, more productive and
environmentally friendly at work. It sounds too good to be true, but it could
soon be the norm.
6
Jan 2020, The Guardian (Adapted)
Question 1 [2 POINTS] Indicate whether the following statements are TRUE or FALSE and write down the sentence or the part of the text that justifies your answer. No points will be given if the evidence is not correct.
1.
Finland has already implemented the four-day working week.
FALSE: Finland’s new prime minister has
recently suggested the idea of a four-day working week.
2.
One of the surveys mentioned said that less than half of those asked would like
to
make
this change.
TRUE: A survey by one British workers’ organisation found that only 45% of employees want a four-day week.
3. The average number of hours worked weekly in
Britain increased in 1919.
FALSE: When working hours in Britain
were cut from about 54 hours a week to 48 hours a week in 1919,
4.
Kellogg`s changed their policy so as not to be different from other companies.
TRUE: It was only dropped because management wanted the firm to have work practices like other companies.
Question 2 [2 POINTS] Choose and answer only TWO of the following questions in your own words according to the text.
1.
What are the advantages to a shorter working week according to the text?
A shorter working week improves productivity considerably because workers make better use of their time. It is also reported to improve people’s lives and make them healthier. It is even said to be good for the environment as it reduces pollution.
2.
Why have some companies and organisations rejected or changed their minds about
this issue?
Implementing a shorter working week can be difficult to do and can be more expensive for the companies. There could be problems with finding staff and with dealing with clients successfully. Some companies are also worried about being different from the norm and appearing to be lazy.
3.
What different information does the text give about working habits in the UK?
IDEAS:
Question 3 [1.5 POINTS] Find words or
phrases in the text that correspond to the words given. You only need to have
five correct answers to get 1.5 points.
1.
Wonderful (Paragraph 1) GLORIOUS
2.
Workers (Paragraph 1) EMPLOYEES
3.
Less in number (Paragraph 2)
FEWER
4.
Employers (Paragraph 3) BOSSES
5.
In fact, actually (Paragraph 4) INDEED
6.
Completely (Paragraph 4) ENTIRELY
Question 4 [1.5 POINTS] Choose the correct option - a, b, c or d - for each question and COPY both the letter and the sentence that follows onto your answer sheet.
1.
Thanks to the changes made in Gothenburg, nurses said...
a. ...they felt better both physically and emotionally.
b.
...they felt better physically but not emotionally.
c.
...they did not feel better either physically or emotionally.
d. …they
felt better emotionally but worse physically.
2.
The text says that people who work fewer hours per week...
a.
...are likely to buy more prepared food.
b. ...are unlikely to buy more prepared food.
c.
...are unlikely to do more cooking at home.
d.
...are unlikely to change their eating habits at all.
3.
The Gothenburg project did not continue...
a.
...because it was difficult to implement.
b. ...because it proved more expensive.
c.
...because customers complained about the service they received.
d.
...because the workers became lazier.
They’re the people who want to buy our house.
Here are some cells which have been affected.
They should give the money to somebody who they think needs the treatment most.
She’s now playing a woman whose son was killed in the First World War.
They’re the people that want to buy our house.
Here are some cells that have been affected.
They’re the people who/that bought our house. (The people bought our house. The people is the subject.)
They’re the people who/that she met at Jon’s party. (She met the people. The peopleis the object.)
Here are some cells which/that show abnormality. (Some cells show abnormality. Some cells is the subject.)
Here are some cells which/that the researcher has identified. (The researcher has identified some cells. Some cells is the object.)
They’re the people she met at Jon’s party.
Here are some cells the researcher has identified.
This is a man who takes his responsibilities seriously.
Not:This is a man, who takes his responsibilities seriously.
She’s the lady who lent me her phone. (who is the subject of the relative clause, so we don’t need the personal pronoun she)
Not:She’s the lady who she lent me her phone.
There are now only two schools in the area that actually teach Latin. (that is the subject of the relative clause, so we don’t need the personal pronoun they)
Not:There are now only two schools in the area that they actually teach Latin.
We had a lovely meal at the place which Phil recommended. (which is the object of the relative clause, so we don’t need the personal pronoun it)
Not:We had a lovely meal at the place which Phil recommended it.
Clare, who I work with, is doing the London marathon this year.
Not:Clare, I work with, is doing the London marathon this year.
Doctors use the testing kit for regular screening for lung and stomach cancers, which account for 70% of cancers treated in the western world.
Alice, who has worked in Brussels and London ever since leaving Edinburgh, will be starting a teaching course in the autumn.
Allen, who scored three goals in the first game, was the only player to perform well.
Not:Allen, that scored three goals in the first game, was the only player to perform well.
Etheridge, who is English-born with Irish parents, replaces Neil Francis, whose injury forced him to withdraw last week.
Unlike American firms – which typically supply all three big American car makers – Japanese ones traditionally work exclusively with one maker.(formal)
And this woman – who I’d never met before – came up and spoke to me.(informal)
non-defining
|
defining
|
He has only one brother, and that brother works at the supermarket.
|
He has more than one brother. The one I’m talking about works at the supermarket.
|
The money is intended for local charities. All these local charities help the homeless.
|
The money is intended for local charities. Some of these local charities help the homeless. There are other local charities as well as these.
|
|
A defining relative clause which we can’t leave out; without this information we do not know which soldier the speaker is referring to.
|
|
Non-defining relative clauses which we can leave out:
The tour party was weakened when Gordon Hamilton withdrew yesterday because of a back injury.
|
I think anyone who speaks in public is nervous beforehand.
I think anyone that speaks in public is nervous beforehand.
Her car, which was very old, broke down after just five miles.
Not:Her car, that was very old, broke down after just five miles.