Shopping roleplays- Technology

Clerk: Shopper: Clerk: Shopper: Clerk: Shopper: Clerk: Shopper: Clerk: Shopper: Clerk: Shopper: Clerk: Shopper:

Welcome to ________. We’re having a sale on ________. That’s great. I need __________. What do you have on sale? Well, we have _______________. What do you recommend? Well, __________are more fashionable and higher quality. Whereas, _________ are not as expensive and they’re more comfortable. What’s the difference in price? With tax, the ________ come to $47.00 and the _______ are $39.00.

So that’s about an $8.00 difference. That’s right. I’ll take the __________. How would you like to pay? I’ll put it on my credit card.             . . . Alright, here’s your receipt. Have a nice day. Thanks. Conversation Questions: Computers, Computer Games,  the internet, and Video Games 1.    Do you own a computer? 2.    What type of computer is it? 3.    Are you good at using computers? 4.    How often do you use the internet? 5.    What sites do you visit most often? 6.    Do you find the internet useful? 7.    How often do you play computer/video games? 8.    Which games do you usually play on? 9.    Why do you like them? 10.    Do you play computer games with your friends? 11.    Which is better, xbox or playstation? 12.    Are you parents happy if you play on the computer? 13.    What computer would you love to buy? 14.    Have you ever completed a game? 15.    Which game are you best at? 16.    Which game do you find boring? 17.    What do you think of RPGs? 18.    Which games would you never play? 19.    Should you be allowed to play video games in school? 20.    Do you play games on your phone? 21.    What do you play? 22.    Have you ever played Angry Birds? 23.    What do you think of it?

Raising awareness: Mobiles

Future forms exercises

Grammar Exercises 

Review of the future tense - 1

1. Choose the most suitable verb form in each sentence.

a) If you arrive late to the party, the best food is going to gowill have gonewill go

b) Don't come to my home at lunch time. I'll be watchingI'll watchI'll have watched my favourite television programme then.

c) Be careful! The train willis going to leave.

d) Please send me a text message as soon as she getswill getwill have got there. I can't wait to see her

e) Can I change my appointment for this afternoon please, because I'll leaveI'm leaving tomorrow.

f) I've just checked the flight details and the plane is going to arrivearrives at 6pm.

g) Where are you going to buywill you buywill have bought your new laptop? You should try the shop on the High Street.

2. Please put the verb in brackets in the most suitable form, all sentences refer to futute time.

a) When I (see)  you tomorrow, I (show)  you my new tattoo.

b) After you (take)  a nap, you (feel)  a lot better

c) I'm sorry but you need to stay in your room until you (finish)  your work.

d) I (buy)  the cigarettes from the corner shop when it (open) .

e) I (let)  you know the second I (find out)  the outcome.

f) Before we (start)  decorating the room, we (have)  lunch

g) We (wait)  in the shelter until the bus (come) 

3. Please put the verb in brackets in the most suitable form, more than one answer may be possible

a) I'm very sorry Mr. Smith (not be)  back in the clinic until 6. You can leave a message for him if you like.

b) I don't think you (have)  any problems when you land in Boston.

c) By the time we get home, the football match (start) .

d) In  years time I (live)  in a different country

e) When you get off the train, I (wait)  for you outside near the carpark

f) (you take) your children with you to Spain

g) This time next week I (ski)  in Italy!

by Oliver Smith

Future forms- Grammar

Ways of Expressing the Future in English

Despite what you will find in some course books and student’s grammars, and hear from some teachers,there is no future tense in English. If we want to refer to future-time situations we can do this in several ways. In these notes, we look at seven ways.

The first five of these are commonly used in both speech and writing:

1. Emma is seeing Luke tomorrow – the present progressive, also known as the present continuous.

2. Emma is going to see Luke tomorrow – BE + going to, sometimes referred to as the “(BE) going to future”.

3. Emma sees Luke tomorrow – the present simple.

4. Emma will see Luke tomorrow - this modal form is sometimes, unhelpfully, called the “future simple”.

5. Emma will be seeing Luke tomorrow – this modal progressive (or continuous) form is sometimes, unhelpfully, called the “future progressive/continuous”.

The last two are used in more restricted contexts:

6. Emma is to see Luke tomorrow – BE + to  + infinitive.

7. Emma to see Luke tomorrow –  to- infinitive.

There are also some so-called ‘future perfect’ constructions, which we will consider at the end of these notes:

8. Emma will have seen Luke …

9. Emma will have been seeing Luke …

10. Emma is going to have seen Luke …

1. the present progressive (also known as the present continuous)

This form usually refers to a situation that began before the moment of speaking, continues at or around, and after, the present moment, and into the future, and is of limited duration:

I am writing these notes on the future. (At this moment).

Lindsay is driving to work this week. (She normally goes by bus).

The present progressive can refer to a future situation that has been arranged before the present time. The arrangement continues through the present until the situation occurs:

Emma is seeing Luke tomorrow, (They arranged this meeting yesterday)

Note that only the context or co-text (in the last example the word tomorrow) can tell us which time-period a present progressive verb form refers to.

Also note that it is simply not possible to make arrangements for some future situations. It is therefore not normally possible to say XIt is raining tomorrow. X

2. BE + going to

Although you may hear or read that this form indicates ‘present intention’, this is not always true. It is hard to imagine any intention in this sentence: “Look at those black clouds; it is going to rain soon.”

BE + going to refers to a future situation for which there is present evidence. In the previous example, the present evidence is the black clouds. In the following example, the present evidence may simply be the speaker’s knowledge that Emma and Luke have arranged the meeting:

Emma is going to see Luke tomorrow.

When the present evidence is an arrangement, then there is, practically speaking, no real difference in meaning between the present progressive and BE + going to.

3. the present simple

The present simple is frequently used for situations that often or regularly happen.  It can therefore be used for a future situation that is part of a regular series of happenings:

The train for Berlin leaves at midnight tonight.

It is also used for something that is seen as part of a fixed timetable:

The sun rises at 07.34 tomorrow. (We can imagine the speaker thinking of a table of sunrise and sunset times.)

Emma sees Luke tomorrow. (We can imagine the speaker mentally looking at Emma’s diary).

4. the modal will + bare infinitive

The modal auxiliary verb will has a number of possible meanings. Four of the more common are:

a. certainty – John left an hour ago, so he will be home by now. (The speaker is certain that John is home)

b. habitual characteristic: Andrea will sit at her desk for hours without saying a word. (This is what she often does.)

c. volition (willingness): I’ll carry your bag for you. (The speaker is offering to carry the bag.)

Fred will carry your bag for you. (The speaker is offering Fred’s services.)

d. instant decision: What will I do tomorrow? I know! I’ll go to the zoo. (The speaker decides to go to the zoo at the very moment of speaking – no plans had been made for this visit.)

Context tells us whether the certainty (a) is about the present, as in the example above, or the future: Prince Charles will become King when the present Queen dies.

Habitual characteristic (b) is something that is shown regularly. It was observed in the past, can be observed in the present, and will presumably be observed in the future. It is not possible to know of a future habitual characteristic, so we do not use this form for purely future reference.

Volition (c), denoting an offer, can refer only to a future situation. Will is normally contracted to ‘ll.

Instant decisions (d) can be made only about a future situation and, usually, only reported by the person making the decision. We therefore usually encounter this meaning only with I or we as the subject. Will is normally contracted to ‘ll. 

The word tomorrow in the following sentence tells us that the seeing (meeting) is in the future:

Emma will see Luke tomorrow.

Only context can tell us whether the speaker is certain of the occurrence of the future meeting, or reporting that Emma is willing to see Luke.

Note that other modals, which have different meanings, can also can also refer to future situations, for example:

Peter might come over next week. (It is possible that this will happen)

You must finish the report before you go home tonight. (You are obliged to finish the report.) )

You may read in some books that shall is used instead of will when the subject is I or we. Only a small minority of native speakers use shall other than in questions, and then only for certainty and instant decision, never for volition or habitual characteristic. Shall is used commonly in questions:

e) making a suggestion: Shall we go to the pub this evening?

f) asking if the person addressed wants the speaker to do something: Shall I arrange the publicity?  

5. The modal will + be + -ing form

Progressive forms usually refer to a situation that began before a time point continues through and after that time point, and into the future, and is of limited duration. The combination of this idea with the modal will, expressing certainty, leads to the modal will + be + -ing form referring to a situation beginning before a future time point and continuing through that time point:

Sally’s plane takes off from Heathrow at 9 o’clock tomorrow, so by about midday she will be flying over Istanbul.

It is also possible that the speaker is more concerned with the pure certainty of the action happening than with volitional aspect that might be implied by the use of WILL by itself:

Emma will be seeing Luke tomorrow.

Some writers claim, with some justification, that this use of modal will + a progressive implies, by its lack of reference to intention, volition or arrangement, a 'casual' future. Depending on the context and co-text, the speaker may be intending a ‘casual’ futurity, or may be indicating a situation in progress at a particular time.

6. BE + to  + infinitive

This form is not common in informal conversation. It refers to something that is to happen in the future as a plan or decree, normally by some authority other than the subject of the sentence, and  is common in television and radio news reports Thus we are unlikely to hear the first of the following examples (unlessEmma and Luke are the names of well-known singers, actors, etc) . We might well hear the second:

Emma is to see Luke tomorrow.

Downing Street announced this morning that the Prime Minister is to fly to Washington this evening for urgent talks about the current crisis.

7. to- infinitive

This form is common only in newspaper headlines, where editors want to announce the news as briefly as possible. Once again, we are unlikely to see the first of the following examples (unless Emma and Luke are the names of well-known singers, actors, etc). We might well see the second:

Emma to see Luke tomorrow.

PM to fly to US.

8. will + have + past participle (third form)

When we refer to a future action completed before a later future time, or a future state continuing up to that later future time, we use will + have + a past participle (third form). This is sometimes known as the ‘future perfect’:

I will have lived here for just over thirteen years when I celebrate my 66th birthday next March. (At the moment of speaking, six months before ‘next March’, the speaker has lived ‘here’ for twelve and a half years.)

By the time she leaves Paris tomorrow, Emma will have seen Luke and told him the news. (When Emma leaves Paris tomorrow, the seeing and telling will be, for her, in the past.)

This form is sometimes known as the ‘future perfect’.

9.  BE + going to + have + past participle (third form)

It is possible, though not very common, for a speaker to suggest that there is present evidence of  a future action completed before a later future time, or a future state continuing up to that later future time, using BE + going to + have + a past participle form (third form):

By the time Emma leaves Paris tomorrow, She is going to have seen Luke and told him the news.

Learners may see/hear this usage, but are recommended to use only 8. will + have + a past participle (third form), which has practically the same meaning, and is far more commonly used.

10. will + have + been + -ing form

When we refer to a future action begun before a later future time and continuing through that later future time, we use will + have + been + -ing form.

By the end of next week, Emma will have been seeing Luke for three months. (She has now, one week before ‘the end of next week’ been seeing him for a week less than three months.)

This form is sometimes known as the ‘future perfect continuous’.

Important Note.

In many sentences, several of the forms can be used perfectly naturally. The final subconscious choice of form is made by speakers at the moment of speaking, and depends on the context of situation as they see it at that moment. Do not think that there is one, and only one, ‘correct’ form in any given situation.

A fuller version of these notes can be found at http://www.gramorak.com/Articles/Future.pdf

Je suis Charlie- Terrorist attacks

Paris attacks underline persistent threat

By PJ CrowleyFormer US Assistant Secretary of State

Millions marched in Paris in a display of unity against violence

Continue reading the main story

Three days of terror attacks in Paris, claiming 17 lives, emphasise the need for international cooperation to tackle violent fundamentalism.

After most terrorist attacks, authorities, the families of victims and broader communities are left to ponder the meaning of such wanton violence, and reconstruct the motives and tactics of those responsible.

Thanks to a remarkable conversation between a French reporter and one of the brothers responsible for the attack on Charlie Hebdo, we have some insight if not yet all the answers.

"We are not killers," Cherif Kouachi told France's BFM TV hours beforea confrontation with French security forces at a printing plant outside Paris.

"We defend the prophet. If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him."

Continue reading the main stor
y

He claimed an affiliation with al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

"I went there and it was Anwar al-Awlaki who financed me," Cherif Kouachi said.

Incongruously, Amedy Coulibaly, who was killed the same day after killing and holding hostages at a Kosher grocery store, told the same French network BFM TV he "coordinated" his actions with the Kouachis, but was part of "Daish" or IS, an offshoot but rival of Al-Qaeda.

Supporters of both groups praised their actions, but it remains unclear if either group directed the attacks given the years between their radicalisation and action.

Awlaki himself was killed in 2011 in a drone strike in Yemen.

Local focus

So what does Paris tell us about the evolving Islamist terrorist threat and what to do about it?

Notwithstanding the emergence of Islamic State, a hybrid that is part terrorist organisation and part insurgency, the threat to the West centres on self-activating individuals or small groups inspired by, but not necessarily controlled by, radical networks.

They identify with the global struggle, but their focus is local.

Continue reading the main stor
y

This localisation may result in more incidents - the past two years have seen attacks at the Boston Marathon, Parliament Hill in Ottawa and a cafe in Sydney, for example - but none involving the ambition of 9/11 or even Madrid in 2004 or London in 2005.

The Paris perpetrators are less soldiers than malware circulating in local networks that can go off at any time.

Rooting them out before they can do damage is easier said than done.

French Prime Minister Manuel Valls rightly declared this challenge as "war."

But this is an era of persistent threat, more like the Cold War in complexity and duration.

This is a generational struggle where the political, economic and social elements will be just as decisive as the military, intelligence and law enforcement.

International cooperation

War involves a broad commitment of resources and will.

Will the Paris rally provoke a response in the Islamic world?

At the international level, countries need to continue to enhance cooperation including the exchange of information on known extremists.

The Kouachi brothers were on the no-fly list but there were evident gaps in surveillance.

There also needs to be a stronger consensus regarding the tools that governments need to better monitor known and unknown extremists, even while acknowledging that perfect security is impossible.

In light of Paris, European countries need to renew the debate launched by Edward Snowden two years ago regarding the line between privacy and security.

At the local level, there needs to be improved community prevention, interceding with young men (and some women) before they succumb to the appeal of the likes of the Islamic State.

This is the first and best line of defence, but does not occur in a vacuum.

The intolerance manifest in the Charlie Hebdo attack has already been a catalyst for a broader debate within France and across Europe.

Video presentation

What you did, where you went, who you visited... a composition turned into a video presentaion.
 
Experts say presentation is everything. 90% of information transmitted to the brain is based on visuals. This by far beats out other cues like touch, smell, and sound. With a video presentation you can enrich your message and truly capture attention by providing the visual elements needed to make you memorable. In fact, this type of video can add that something extra to your delivery a
nd foster your speaking skills.
Remember to prepare your personal presentation about what you did, ate, visited, played, etc. so that everyone can watch your skills as a great communicator in English.
Deadline: Next 16 Jan